Elitmus Verbal Ability
Paragraph/Instructions
Choose the most appropriate choice to fill in the underlined
portion(s) of the sentence below:
Question 1 of 20
Katrina is exhausted. She ____________.
A.
|
is running
|
||
B.
|
has been running
|
||
C.
|
had been running
|
||
D.
|
was running
|
Question 2 of 20
The least considered in latest Marxist attack________the
innocent victims.
A.
|
was
|
||
B.
|
were
|
||
C.
|
are
|
||
D.
|
have been
|
Question 3 of 20
You________drive any car. But you_________not drive mine.
A.
|
can, will
|
||
B.
|
will,can
|
||
C.
|
can, may
|
||
D.
|
may, can
|
Question 4 of 20
The wages of sin __________ death.
A.
|
is
|
||
B.
|
are
|
||
C.
|
has
|
||
D.
|
have
|
Paragraph/Instructions
Delivering a speech at an institutional gathering recently on
the topic of ‘Rethinking religions’, a prominent, MP, said that by the middle
of this century religion would be very different, that its present form would
be completely unrecognizable, given the changes brought about by an emerging
information society. "Religion as we know it will not be the same in 50
years. There has been a rapid democratization of the world. The world is a much
smaller place. The pronouncements of religions can therefore not remain the
same," he said. More importantly, he maintained that some notions central
to religion would not survive the future: "You have to stay with the times
or you'll be left behind."
One wonders, if he had also been sitting in the audience
listening to himself would his jaw have dropped‘? For if there's one thing we
all know that doesn't change, it's religion. Christianity, Islam, Hinduism,
etc, have lived comfortably through many technological and other intellectual
upheavals in the past such as the Renaissance, printing and the industrial
revolution, for instance, and have emerged even more stubborn and ossified if
anything afterwards. Sure, peripheral elements change —heretics are no longer
burned at the stake, sati is outlawed — but "notions central to
religion" not surviving, say, the Internet, is laughable.
That's because the central notion of all religions, concepts
that are cold welded to the first few pages of any scripture, is that there is
a God who is the creator of all things including us, that we have a duty to love
and worship Him and that He stands for everything which is good. These things
have so far reliably demonstrated a sure fire ability to endure millennia.
On the other hand, consider Parsis. More and more members of
these modern day descendants of migrants who fled persecution in Iran more than
1,000 years ago, are turning to new technology to keep their ancient
Zoroastrian religion alive and kicking. "Websites, blogs, on line
directories and match making portals are being used by the close knit but
scattered and shrinking community to stay in touch and true to the 3,500 year
old faith," reports AFP. In fact, they're doing exactly the opposite of
what our prominent MP fears: they're staying with the times for fear of being
left behind. It's what all religions have always done in order to keep the
faith.
Question 5 of 20
We can infer, from the use of the phrase "... rapid
democratization of the world", in the first para, that:
A.
|
the world is shrinking, thanks
to improved communication.
|
||
B.
|
countries prefer democracy as
a form of government.
|
||
C.
|
religion would have changed
beyond recognition
|
||
D.
|
people are accorded more
freedom in terms of choices.
|
Question 6 of 20
As understood from the passage, what does the phrase notion
central to religion not surviving, say, the internet is laughable" in the
2"" para mean?
A.
|
Central ideas of religion not
able to outlast internet is ridiculous.
|
||
B.
|
Central ideas of religion not
able to overpower internet is silly.
|
||
C.
|
As per information available
on the internet, religion is not going to survive.
|
||
D.
|
As per information available
on the internet, the central ideas of religion, will not be pertinent to
religion in future.
|
Question 7 of 20
What is the primary reason for Parsis turning to new
technologies?
A.
|
To stay in touch
|
||
B.
|
To perpetuate their faith
|
||
C.
|
To increase their shrinking
population by matchmaking
|
||
D.
|
To influence the other
communities
|
Question 8 of 20
"...and have emerged even more stubborn and ossified."
What has emerged more stubborn and ossified?
A.
|
Religion
|
||
B.
|
Christianity, Islam and
Hinduism
|
||
C.
|
Industrial revolution
|
||
D.
|
Renaissance
|
Paragraph/Instructions
On the whole, the American population has very little taste for
income redistribution as economic policy. Beginning in the 1930s, public
opinion polls have rarely shown strong support for income redistribution;
during times of economic hardship, the percentage of Americans in favor of such
a system has barely crested 50 percent. Similarly, Americans have been
reluctant to press for a limit on the profits of big corporations, with less
than a third of those polled in the 20 year span between 1950 and 1970
favouring such a policy.
Even during the Depression, the populace was reluctant to
embrace income redistribution as a solution to the country’s woes. In 1939,
over 60 percent of respondents indicated that the government should not
increase taxes on the wealthy and an overwhelming majority—over 80
percent—rejected the idea of the government confiscating wealth. Clearly, the
American spirit of Lockean liberalism and rugged individualism runs deep. It
appears that most people are content to trust income distribution to the
private market.
Of course, while overall support for income distribution remains
low on average, there are some significant differences in levels of support
based on income levels. As expected, those in the lowest income bracket
demonstrate the strongest support for employment and income maintenance
programs. However, contrary to expectations, these differences in support were
not largest during the volatile economic times of the 1930s and 1940s. Rather,
the documented differences in support based on income have been relatively
stable over time. On the whole, political scientists have noticed anywhere from
a 22 percent to 34 percent difference between the opinions of those classified
as "prosperous" and those classified as "poor" on the
question of income redistribution.
Question 9 of 20
The main point made by the passage is that:
A.
|
Income redistribution is not viewed as the solution to economic
difficulties by the majority of American citizens.
|
||
B.
|
The American spirit of Lockean liberalism is primarily responsible for
the population’s rejection of income redistribution.
|
||
C.
|
Despite some variations in support based on income levels, the American
population on the whole views income redistribution policies with disfavor,
even during times of economic hardship.
|
||
D.
|
Although polls have indicated some variation in response level, on the
whole, less than 50 percent of Americans support income redistribution.
|
||
E.
|
Poll results on government income redistribution policies have remained
stable over time, even during periods of economic hardship.
|
Question 10 of 20
The passage states that differences in support for governmental
income redistribution policies:
A.
|
defied expectations by showing that those in lower income brackets had
less support for these programs than those in higher income brackets
|
||
B.
|
vary greatly depending the income level of respondents and the economic
conditions at the time the poll is taken
|
||
C.
|
are not, for the most part, significantly affected by outside influences
|
||
D.
|
are not significantly different due to the American ideal of rugged individualism
|
||
E.
|
are based solely on differences in the income levels of respondents
|
Question 11 of 20
Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
I. During the Depression, a smaller percentage of Americans
supported raising taxes than supported government confiscation of wealth
II. Today, about a third of Americans support limits on
corporate profits
III. Before 1930, a majority of Americans supported income
distribution
A.
|
I only
|
||
B.
|
I and II only
|
||
C.
|
I and III only
|
||
D.
|
I, II, and III
|
||
E.
|
None of these
|
Explanation :
This is an inference question. None of the statements are true,
although each of them is cleverly worded to make you believe they are. The
first statement reverses the relationship in the passage.
During the Depression, around 60 percent of the people were
against tax increases, which means about 40 percent supported them or had no
opinion, while 80 percent were opposed to government confiscation of property,
meaning 20 percent supported it or had no opinion. Thus, a larger percentage
supported raising taxes.
The passage only gives data from 1950 to 1970 on corporate
profits, so you can’t infer what people think today. And no information is
provided on opinions previous to 1930.
Thus, none of the statements can be properly inferred.
Question 12 of 20
An assumption underlying the author’s assertion in the second
paragraph is that:
A.
|
the private market is the best way to distribute income in an economy
|
||
B.
|
Americans had never experienced economic hardships as severe as those
experienced during the Great Depression
|
||
C.
|
Lockean liberalism and rugged individualism entail a reliance on private
markets for income distribution
|
||
D.
|
the government had no intentions of confiscating property during the Great
Depression
|
||
E.
|
income redistribution would be insufficient to solve the country’s
economic woes during the Great Depression
|
Paragraph/Instructions
Economists have long recognized a persistent and unfounded
belief among the population which has come to be known as the anti-foreign
bias. As a result of this bias, most people systematically underestimate the
economic benefits of interactions with foreign nations. Some psychologists
believe that this bias is rooted in a natural distrust of the "other,"
while others believe that a form of folk wisdom, seemingly in accord with
common sense but nonetheless incorrect, explains the bias. This wisdom asserts
that in any transaction there is a winner and a loser and any foreign nation
that wants to engage in trade must be doing so because it seeks its own
advantage. But nothing could be further from truth.
No less an authority than Adam Smith, one of the fathers of the
modern free market system, spoke glowingly of foreign trade in his influential
treatise Wealth of Nations. "What is prudence in the conduct of every
private family, can scarce be folly in a great kingdom," said Smith. His
point is simple. A baker trades his bread to the cobbler for shoes and both men
benefit from the trade because of the value of specialization. The same
principle works for nations. Even more startling, a basic economic theorem, the
Law of Comparative Advantage, states that mutually beneficial trade is possible
even if one nation is less productive than the other.
Suppose a citizen of Country X can produce either 10 computers
or five bushels of wheat and a citizen of Country Y can produce either three
computers or two bushels of wheat. If one citizen from Country X switches from
producing wheat to computers and three citizens from Country Y switch from
producing computers to wheat, there is a net gain of one computer and one
bushel of wheat.
Question 13 of 20
As it is described in the passage, which of the following most
closely resembles "folk wisdom?"
A.
|
A farmer decides that it is
going to rain after scanning the sky for dark clouds.
|
||
B.
|
A child asks his parents why
the sky is blue and the parents reply "because it is."
|
||
C.
|
A driver believes taking local
roads instead of the highway will allow her to reach her destination faster
because there will be less traffic on the local roads.
|
||
D.
|
A person spends 10 dollars on
lottery tickets every week because he believes that "someone has to
win."
|
||
E.
|
A mother tells her child to
put on a jacket so he won’t catch cold, even though colds are caused by
viruses.
|
Question 14 of 20
The passage is primarily concerned with which of the following?
A.
|
Arguing for an increase in
trade with foreign nations.
|
||
B.
|
Providing a historical context
for a long-standing belief.
|
||
C.
|
Demonstrating the fallacy of a
particular way of thinking.
|
||
D.
|
Illustrating an economic
principle through an example.
|
||
E.
|
Describing Adam Smith’s
contributions to the theory of trade.
|
Question 15 of 20
The author most likely mentions the "baker" and the
"cobbler" in order to:
A.
|
provide a concrete
illustration of an economic principle
|
||
B.
|
discuss the types of goods
available during Adam Smith’s time
|
||
C.
|
evaluate an example used in
Smith’s Wealth of Nations
|
||
D.
|
show that all trade is based
on specialization
|
||
E.
|
give a real world example of
the importance of foreign trade
|
Question 16 of 20
The author most probably uses the word "startling" in
reference to the Law of Comparative Advantage because:
A.
|
it is surprising that the general
public is unaware of the Law of Comparative Advantage
|
||
B.
|
the Law proves that all
foreign trade is mutually beneficial
|
||
C.
|
it is puzzling that no one
before Adam Smith thought of the Law
|
||
D.
|
the Law of Comparative
Advantage holds even when there is an imbalance in the capabilities of the
nations.
|
||
E.
|
most countries do not consider
the Law of Comparative Advantage when devising their trade policies
|
Paragraph/Instructions
There are two gaps in each of the following sentences. From the
pair of words given, choose one that fills the gaps most appropriately.
The first word in the pair should fill the first gap.
Question 17 of 20
Their achievement in the field of literature is described as
________ sometimes it is even called _________.
A.
|
magnificent, irresponsible
|
||
B.
|
insignificant, influential
|
||
C.
|
significant, paltry
|
||
D.
|
unimportant, trivial
|
Question 18 of 20
But ________ we are now regularly written not just for tools but
well-established practices, organisations and institutions not all of which
seem to be ________ away.
A.
|
reports, withering
|
||
B.
|
stories, trading
|
||
C.
|
books, dying
|
||
D.
|
obituaries, fading
|
Paragraph/Instructions
Sentences A,B,C and so on given in each question when properly
sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Choose the most logical ordeer of
sentences from among the four given choices
Question 19 of 20
A. It begins with an ordinary fever and a moderate cough.
B. India could be under attack from a class of germs that cause
what are called typical pneumonia.
C. Slowly a sore throat progresses to bronchitis and then
pneumonia and respiratory complications.
D. It appears like the ordinary flu but baffled doctors find
that the usual drugs don’t work.
A.
|
ABCD
|
||
B.
|
BDAC
|
||
C.
|
ADCB
|
||
D.
|
BCDA
|
Question 20 of 20
A. Good advertising can make people buy your products even
if it sucks.
B. A dollar spent on brain-washing is more cost-effective
than a dollar spent on product improvement.
C. That’s important because it takes pressure off you to make
good products.
D. Obviously, there is a minimum quality that every
product has to achieve, it should be able to withstand the shipping process
without becoming unrecognizable.
A.
|
BACD
|
||
B.
|
ACBD
|
||
C.
|
ADCB
|
||
D.
|
BCDA
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment